--- title: "LEVEL: grade the claim before you change your mind" description: "LEVEL: grade the claim before you change your mind" image: "https://lenvanderhof.com/photos/len-portrait-1.jpg" --- Framework # LEVEL The Evidence-Aware Life LEVEL: grade the claim before you change your mind The moves 5 ## The definition LEVEL is a five-move check for grading a claim before you change a belief, a habit, a roadmap, or a bet: Locate, Estimate, Value, Expose, Lean. Locate names the claim in one sentence. Estimate the stakes of being wrong. Value the evidence: name the rung it actually sits on, not the rung the packaging implied, then check its quality within that rung. Expose the gap between that support and what the decision requires. Lean with a next step proportionate to that gap and those stakes. The Evidence Ladder's seven rungs are kinds of support, not a quality scale. Confidence is not a grade. ## When to use it Use it when a confident study, thread, pitch, or offhand remark is about to change a diet, a hire, a spend, or a mind, and you cannot name the rung under the claim. ## The moves 1. 01 ### Locate Name the claim in one sentence. If you cannot, you are grading packaging. 2. 02 ### Estimate Set the bar by what being wrong costs, not by how badly you want the claim true. 3. 03 ### Value Name the rung the evidence actually sits on, then check its quality, independence, and relevance within that rung. 4. 04 ### Expose Expose the gap between the support you hold and what the decision requires. 5. 05 ### Lean Choose a proportionate next step: a bounded action, the right help, or a justified deferral. One claim ## Run LEVEL before you lean Five moves, one claim, before a belief, a purchase, or a pivot. This is calibration, not skepticism and not a validated clinical scale. The book that owns the name is live. 1. 01 ### Locate Write the claim in one sentence. If you cannot, you are grading packaging. 2. 02 ### Estimate Name what being wrong costs. The bar follows the stakes, not how badly you want it true. 3. 03 ### Value Name the rung the evidence is on, then check its quality within that rung. A confident stranger is not a test you ran. 4. 04 ### Expose Name the gap between the support you hold and what the decision requires. If you cannot, you have not graded it. 5. 05 ### Lean Choose a proportionate next step: a bounded action, the right help, or a justified deferral. ## The book Available now ### The Evidence-Aware Life How to Think in Levels Instead of Opinions Open the bookThe articleThe series ## Related frameworks CALIBRATE ### The Calibrated Mind CALIBRATE is the practice of matching the strength of a judgment to the strength of the evidence, then updating when the facts move. Confidence is a report, not a personality trait. A loud claim with a thin source is a calibration failure, not conviction. TRACE ### The Verified Research Loop TRACE is a five-step research loop: Target, Retrieve, Assess, Cross-check, Export. Target writes the research brief before any search runs. Retrieve obtains the source bodies, not one confident pass. Assess appraises what each body can bear per claim; tiers are source roles, not credibility weights. Cross-check records what each source supports or contradicts, and maps shared origins. Export is a versioned decision memo a co-founder can act on. Fluent collection is not research. TRACE is the verification structure. GRAIN ### The RAG Engineer GRAIN is a retrieval loop: Gather, Rank, Assemble, Inspect, Navigate. Gather governs the corpus: sources, permissions, and versioning. Rank retrieves candidate passages and reranks them for the question actually asked. Assemble builds the context the model may see. Inspect traces a wrong answer back to the chunk and retrieval decision behind it. Navigate keeps the index fresh: TTL policy, re-ingest, and change detection. If you cannot point at the passage, you do not have retrieval. You have a fluent guess. ## Essays on this site - [What is LEVEL?](https://lenvanderhof.com/en/blog/what-is-level/) - [LEVEL vs CALIBRATE](https://lenvanderhof.com/en/blog/level-vs-calibrate/) ## Terminology - [LEVEL](https://lenvanderhof.com/glossary/level/) - [CALIBRATE](https://lenvanderhof.com/glossary/calibrate/) - [TRACE](https://lenvanderhof.com/glossary/trace/) - [GRAIN](https://lenvanderhof.com/glossary/grain/) - [AI agent](https://lenvanderhof.com/glossary/ai-agent/) - [Human in the loop](https://lenvanderhof.com/glossary/human-in-the-loop/) - [Override doctrine](https://lenvanderhof.com/glossary/override-doctrine/) Not a wellness brand, not a clinical instrument, and not a synonym for CALIBRATE. LEVEL grades one claim. CALIBRATE is the longer confidence practice. The Evidence-Aware Life is available now in English and Dutch paperback, hardcover, and Kindle. ## Citation LEVEL (The Evidence-Aware Life). Len P. van der Hof, Systems for the Strategic Self. https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/level/ ```json { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [ { "@type": "DefinedTerm", "@id": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/level/#term", "name": "LEVEL", "description": "LEVEL is a five-move check for grading a claim before you change a belief, a habit, a roadmap, or a bet: Locate, Estimate, Value, Expose, Lean. Locate names the claim in one sentence. Estimate the stakes of being wrong. Value the evidence: name the rung it actually sits on, not the rung the packaging implied, then check its quality within that rung. Expose the gap between that support and what the decision requires. Lean with a next step proportionate to that gap and those stakes. The Evidence Ladder's seven rungs are kinds of support, not a quality scale. Confidence is not a grade.", "url": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/level/", "inDefinedTermSet": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/" }, { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/level/#webpage", "url": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/level/", "name": "LEVEL", "description": "LEVEL is a five-move check for grading a claim before you change a belief, a habit, a roadmap, or a bet: Locate, Estimate, Value, Expose, Lean. Locate names the claim in one sentence. Estimate the stakes of being wrong. Value the evidence: name the rung it actually sits on, not the rung the packaging implied, then check its quality within that rung. Expose the gap between that support and what the decision requires. Lean with a next step proportionate to that gap and those stakes. The Evidence Ladder's seven rungs are kinds of support, not a quality scale. Confidence is not a grade.", "inLanguage": "en", "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://lenvanderhof.com/#website" }, "about": { "@id": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/level/#term" }, "mainEntity": { "@id": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/level/#term" }, "breadcrumb": { "@id": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/level/#breadcrumb" } }, { "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "@id": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/level/#breadcrumb", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://lenvanderhof.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Frameworks", "item": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "LEVEL", "item": "https://lenvanderhof.com/frameworks/level/" } ] } ] } ```